Mike Glasser
08-02-2006, 05:41 PM
In reviewing concerns from member of the Police Association of New Orleans and other non-member officers, a question arose with regard to the Department’s practice of overtime compensation to its employees. Department members whose duty obligations compel them to work beyond their scheduled Tour of Duty, typically are not paid, despite having actually worked. There are a number of reasons why an officer might work beyond the scheduled tour. Examples would include, but not be limited to, the mandated completion of a police report of an incident which began prior to the end of the officer’s Tour of Duty, the medical treatment of a prisoner in custody prior to being surrendered to Central Lockup, or the time spent waiting for support units, such as Crime Scene Technicians, K-9, tow trucks at accidents, etc..
In addition, if an officer injured on duty seeks medical treatment, and the time spent receiving treatment goes beyond the officer’s scheduled tour, the officer is entitled to be paid overtime.
And further, if officers are required to perform duties on off-time, beyond their scheduled Tour of Duty, such as acquiring new uniform parts which are distributed form a central location during specified hours, and officers not on duty are mandated to go and obtain those uniforms, they are entitled to be compensated.
This list is not comprehensive but describes some rather typical issues that arise almost daily in form or fashion. The PANO Legal Staff & Board members reviewed several Code of Federal Regulations pertaining to these matter as follows:
29 CFR 785.11 General
29 CFR 785.13 Duty of Management
29 CFR 785.17 On call Time
29 CFR 785.28 Involuntary Attendance
29 CFR 785.43 Medical Attention
29 CFR 785.211 General Call Back Pay
By our interpretation, these Codes require payment for the instances I have cited and others not included in my limited examples. To this end, PANO President Mike Glasser, Vice-President Bryant Winninger and PANO Attorney Frank DeSalvo met with City Attorneys and discussed the matter, presenting examples of the issues cited above and the appropriate federal regulations. The conclusion of the City Attorneys is that in these instances, the City is obliged to pay overtime.
Therefore, it is recommended that supervisors insure that when officers work beyond their scheduled Tour of Duty, the hours should be entered into the TRIP system, to the exact minute, with an explanation in the REMARKS section of the TRIP entry. While not yet required, prudence also dictates that the supervisor may wish to submit or at least have on file, a 105 (Inter-office Correspondence) with any attendant documentation demonstrating why the overtime occurred and was necessary. It is anticipated that this will probably become necessary very soon.
That, of course is for occurrences from this point forward. With respect to previous instances, overtime compensation may be realized with the submission of a Form 93, Payroll Adjustment, bearing in mind that documentation of the hours worked would be necessary, such as TRIP sheets, along with an explanation as to why the overtime was necessary. Overtime requested without the attendant documentation to support the payment requested would likely be denied. Any questions as to specific incidents should be addressed to Ms. Stephanie Landry, Commander of Personnel.
ONE NOPD
In addition, if an officer injured on duty seeks medical treatment, and the time spent receiving treatment goes beyond the officer’s scheduled tour, the officer is entitled to be paid overtime.
And further, if officers are required to perform duties on off-time, beyond their scheduled Tour of Duty, such as acquiring new uniform parts which are distributed form a central location during specified hours, and officers not on duty are mandated to go and obtain those uniforms, they are entitled to be compensated.
This list is not comprehensive but describes some rather typical issues that arise almost daily in form or fashion. The PANO Legal Staff & Board members reviewed several Code of Federal Regulations pertaining to these matter as follows:
29 CFR 785.11 General
29 CFR 785.13 Duty of Management
29 CFR 785.17 On call Time
29 CFR 785.28 Involuntary Attendance
29 CFR 785.43 Medical Attention
29 CFR 785.211 General Call Back Pay
By our interpretation, these Codes require payment for the instances I have cited and others not included in my limited examples. To this end, PANO President Mike Glasser, Vice-President Bryant Winninger and PANO Attorney Frank DeSalvo met with City Attorneys and discussed the matter, presenting examples of the issues cited above and the appropriate federal regulations. The conclusion of the City Attorneys is that in these instances, the City is obliged to pay overtime.
Therefore, it is recommended that supervisors insure that when officers work beyond their scheduled Tour of Duty, the hours should be entered into the TRIP system, to the exact minute, with an explanation in the REMARKS section of the TRIP entry. While not yet required, prudence also dictates that the supervisor may wish to submit or at least have on file, a 105 (Inter-office Correspondence) with any attendant documentation demonstrating why the overtime occurred and was necessary. It is anticipated that this will probably become necessary very soon.
That, of course is for occurrences from this point forward. With respect to previous instances, overtime compensation may be realized with the submission of a Form 93, Payroll Adjustment, bearing in mind that documentation of the hours worked would be necessary, such as TRIP sheets, along with an explanation as to why the overtime was necessary. Overtime requested without the attendant documentation to support the payment requested would likely be denied. Any questions as to specific incidents should be addressed to Ms. Stephanie Landry, Commander of Personnel.
ONE NOPD